Tuesday, August 31, 2010

拉大还是拉长?

?官有緣:拉大週內答覆要不要錢

中国报
2010年9月1日

(怡保31日訊)慈善家官有緣今日促請拉曼大學就捐獻3000萬令吉一事,限定在一週內答覆,否則將把這筆錢用作其他慈善用途!
官有緣今午在住宅接受訪問時,也表達個人立場和交代捐獻的出發點,同時針對此次捐款的種種疑問,一一交代。

而且,在回應馬華總會長拿督斯里蔡細歷的言論時,官有緣表示,若要錢就直接致電他本人即可,不需要通過任何人!
他強調,一直以來都是以捐獻來推動教育事業,認為教育比任何一切都來得重要。

「我不是沒有捐助老人院或孤兒院,但我更重視教育,尤其是貧困子弟的升學福利。」

他指出,對於撥款,並不是就把錢捐出去,提出的條件包括由一個以官有緣為名義的基金會,負責全權主導宿舍建設工程。
「我並不是要圖利或貪求什麼,財富並不是賺取更多或是儲蓄更多的錢,人到無求品自高。」

沒給予拒絕理由

不過,這名多家上市公司創辦人,對於拉曼大學遲遲不接受捐款感到費解,從今年3月1日致函大學都沒有獲得回覆,也沒有給予拒絕捐款的理由。

官有緣也提到,在最早期時,前馬華總會長拿督斯里翁詩傑與其他馬華領袖,也曾會晤他並談及此事,未料事情未辦妥前,翁詩傑便已退位。

「我是在去年8月20日首次接觸金寶拉曼大學,表示捐3000萬令吉興建學生宿舍的意願,但至今已有一年,校方還是沒有接受捐款。」
「我也曾與幾名拉曼大學高層見面,表達要捐錢興建學生宿捨的意願。然而,在這一年內,我們見面會談至少5至6次之多,仍然沒有答覆。」

「所以,我這次是給予他們最後的期限,否則,這筆錢我會轉捐至其他慈善用途。」

另外,官有緣也提及,祇要是貧困的學生,家庭收入低於2000令吉,即可以向他提出申請獎學金,而且無需歸還。

他也說,目前共有資助70名拉曼大學的學生,最主要是希望貧困的學生能接受高等教育,並且成才後要飲水思源,把這種捐助貧困學生的精神傳承下去。

本刊的话

(01) 官有缘,其实是“钱有缘”,跟“金钱有缘分”,赚了很多钱,想捐给人家,跟金钱脱离关系,可惜,马华好象不当一回事。

(02) 这个年代怪事越来越多,自己有钱捐给人家,捐钱的人在跳脚,受惠者完全不在乎?

(03) 本刊探悉,拉大不建宿舍,事前的确有言在先,给当地的屋主,大赚一笔租金。

(04) 如今,整件事情被捅出来,建宿舍一事,蔡总应该有所决断了。

(05) 还有,在任拉大理事会主席敦林良实、在任拉大校长为什么不出声?

(06) 现在是资讯时代,无需等待好几天,才看到拉大的回应。

(07) 一天拉大不正式回应,解释清楚来龙去脉,民众多一个机会减少马华的分数。

(08) 外面闹的沸沸扬扬,拉大校长和高级职员还在开会吗?

(09) 还有,拉大的学生理事会,学运领袖们,这么多天了,为什么不敢出声,你们亲历其境,应该站出来讲话啊。

(10) 拉大是拉大来做,还是是拉长来做,一件小事情等这么久,不如改为“拉长”吧。

10 comments:

KH said...

钱有缘在搞事?为何当初建拉大不捐獻呢??
捐獻付提带的條件?

Anonymous said...

To KH,

Yes, Mr guan Yew Yuan is creating trouble. The attached conditions is to prevent MCA from appointing their cronies from getting the contraction job. Rememebr 30000 bcome 3000?? Aiya, why you are so forgetful. Or you are one of the cronies. Getting the residents to vote MCA ......?? Wait long-long.

Anonymous said...

Whatever it is, MCA got to look into this problem for public perception reflects very bad on MCA. How come cronism can creep into education ? Is there no where else to invest and to make money ?

If the allegation is true, then you cannot blame the public for resisting and distrusting MCA anymore. CSL got to do something in the name of "transformation", b4it si too late.

I agree with this blogger, how come Tun Ling and the Vice-Chancellor have not spoken up ? What about the student union ? Are we not saying that uni students today are very converned about current issues ? How can student leaders keep quiet for so long ?

THIS THE KIND OF ISSUE THE STUDENTS LEADERS SHOULD TALK ABOUT B4 THAT DONOR SPLASH IT IN THE PUBLIC.

Anonymous said...

This guy is from a group related to "opposition party", that's why CSL is quite hesitating..

This type of similar cases had happen in Seremban before !

Adam

Anonymous said...

tandYes student leaders in UTAR campus must say something. Are they satisfied with high rentals charges imposed by private house owners around that area ? If not, what make them keep quiet ?

BTW, we have heard of uni students demanding for freedom of speech and association. They want UUCA (AUKU) amended to make way for active political participation. Now the basic question to ask is: are they competent or not ? By keeping long silence over this particular issue, UTAR students look so helpless, cannot even defend themselves, what more to expect them to help other people.

ARE THESE STUDENTS PRETENDING LIKE VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE, BUT IN ACTUAL FACT KNOWS VERY LITTLE. THEY ONLY KNOW HOW TO ENGAGE IN HOT POLITICAL TOPICS BCOS SOME PATIES IS PUPPETING FROM BEHIND ?

Anonymous said...

see we give them the stand-alone kind of scenario, the students cannot react properly. Still waiting from puppet makers to operate from behind ?

Anonymous said...

起宿舍?这不就是要“赶绝”当地那些把屋子租出去的居民?

还没有起好,我看,国阵金宝国会议员就拉柴了。

Anonymous said...

Donation must not come with conditions. This is the first time a contributor requesting absolute power to decide on who the development contract should be awarded. I support UTAR Mgmt to reject this type of donation. It is an insult to the UTAR Mgmt. You have done well since the inception of UTAR. You don't have to prove anything to anyone!

Anonymous said...

You see when MCA hit the headlines by awarding 50 scholarship to independent schools students, DAP make sure that this event is subdued by Kuan Yew Yin donation saga. Everything is strategically timed to make sure that whatever MCA does, it no longer attract the attention of Chinese community. This is the tragedy of MCA. Somehow it cannot function properly, what more to transform and to reconstruct. On the contrary, it is doomed to fail.

Anonymous said...

Koon Yew Yin (官有緣), want to donate but spell out his conditions. You are take advantage of free advertisement and think public are fool?