Wednesday, October 7, 2009

去年叫做“民主自由竞选”,今年变成“篡权大会"?

翁詩傑:三宣言圖推翻我“蔡細歷明顯要上位”

中国报
07/10/2009

(哥打峇魯6日訊)馬華總會長拿督斯里翁詩杰指出,遭凍結黨籍的前署理總會長拿督斯里蔡細歷昨日發表三大宣言,明顯是為了“倒翁”,然后順位接任。

他說,蔡細歷曾說過不會要現任領導層下台,昨日卻發表三大宣言,雖說是為了鞏固馬華勢力,事實上卻是為了拉他(翁詩傑)下台。
他說,蔡細歷發表什么宣言都可以,而且也不是第一次,但這次“倒翁”的意圖非常明顯。

“他曾經發誓,不會把我領導的馬華會長理事會拉下台,也沒有想過要上位。
“事實擺在眼前,包括昨日發表的三大宣言,及策劃推翻總會長的領導,然后讓他自己恢復黨籍和黨署理主席,並接過我的職位。”

特大結果交給天意

翁詩杰也是交通部長。他昨晚在本市萬麗酒店與丹州馬華中央代表交流后,在記者會上如此指出。馬華總秘書拿督王茀明亦陪同出席。
他也說,蔡細歷批評他的領導,他對此深感遺憾,他認為這並非成熟的領袖作風,不過他不想回應或反駁,以免引起爭論。
“我今天來到這裡,是要向中央代表解釋近期的馬華的內部糾紛,讓代表們了解來龍去脈,關于10月10日舉行的馬華特大,結果不在我的能力範圍,我交給天意或中央代表去決定。”
無論如何,他非常感謝丹州中央代表出席交流會。昨晚他原訂下午6時30分抵達,但因班機延誤,晚上9時抵達會場時,丹州中央代表依然耐心等待。
動機昭然若揭*馬華中委蔡金泉
蔡細歷終于露出狐狸尾巴,其發動召開特大的終極目標就是要當總會長。
蔡氏“篡位”動機昭然若揭,並嚴厲譴責后者企圖矇騙中央代表追隨他進行分裂黨。
當初蔡氏假惺惺要求恢復馬華黨籍,現在終于知道他企圖。
我們可以看出蔡細歷把特大,變成他分裂黨和篡黨奪權的工具,暴露出他的權欲熏心,個人野心急劇膨脹。

奉行3個Reject*馬華中委陳清涼

我呼籲馬華中央代表在10月10日的特大發揮3R精神,也就是3個Reject,即否決特大前三個議案。
中央代表在特大投票時,應該要Reject、Reject、Reject,即對前3個議案投否決票,以3R精神支持總會長翁詩傑繼續領導馬華,並讓現任領導層以一個團隊帶領馬華走出低潮,振興黨威。
從蔡細歷發表的3R宣言來看,顯示他很早已經策劃要當馬華總會長,他發起特大最終目的也是為此。

變相競選宣言*馬華檳州署理主席翁協文

蔡細歷推出的3R宣言,是變相的總會長競選宣言,也充分顯示蔡細歷的司馬昭之心,已隨3R宣言不攻自破。
雖然蔡細歷無意成為總會長,但蔡氏在雙十特大前推出3R宣言,確實引人遐想。

既然蔡細歷表明無意當總會長,那么所謂的宣言就沒有存在的必要。特大還有3個關鍵的提案等著代表們議決,屆時局勢才會明朗化。蔡細歷在特大前推出宣言,是一項拉票的伎倆,更顯示他的狼子野心,不只是恢復其黨籍以讓他“回家”這么簡單而已。

本刊的话

(01) 古中国奉行皇朝统治,君王乃真命天子,是一国之尊,任何人都不能妄想篡位夺权,万一被揭发,即刻满门抄斩、诛灭九族。

(02) 中国古王朝血淋淋的官场图景,直到今天还深深影响着华裔的意识形态,以为政治是恐怖的,参政会招惹杀生之祸,中委蔡金泉的谈话加深了这种负面印象,呜呼哀哉。

(03) 民主国家、民主政党,政治没有血腥,也没有所谓“密谋篡位”,因为中委也好,总会长也好,区会主席也一样,权位是由党员委托的,历时最长三年,但是随时可以表决和检讨。

(04) 翁总以1429票之多,荣任一党之尊,任期长达3年之久,可惜,他不珍惜党员给予的委托,10多个月来用尽心思,乱党滥权,只为拼倒一个人,政绩空泛、党务苍白,中央代表有充足的理由通过不信任动议,检讨翁总的表现。


(05) 召集特大不是蔡细历一个人的事情,也不是翁总、蔡金泉、翁协文或者陈清凉的私事,是921个人根据党章30.3条款集体召集的民主论坛。

(06) 翁总能不能通过党意检验,或者老蔡能否恢复党籍及党职,先要问过2377中央代表,看看同意的人占大多数,还是反对的人占大多数,如此简单罢了。


(07) 还有3天,中央代表就要齐集都门,履行神圣的任务,决定马华的前途和命运,蔡金泉采用“篡位夺权”来形容特大的集体决定,形同公开恐吓中央代表,否决整个党的民主机制,也否定他本身的合法地位。

(08) 蔡金泉的口气好大,是不是大过其他2376名中央代表?否则,他不可以信口开河,把1010特大当成是1010篡权大会。

(09) 中央代表的集体行动,受党章赋权保护,1010特大也是根据党章召集,光明正大在三春礼堂开会,秘密投票表决,何来密谋篡权之说?

(10) 去年10月18日,中央代表集体投票选出总会长、副总和中委会,就叫做“民主自由竞选”?,今天1010特大,同一批人、在同一个地方(三春礼堂)出席投票表决,马上被当权派套上“篡位夺权”的标签,蔡金泉身为基层的榜样,说话到底有没经过大脑?

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

MACC probe on Tiong’s allegation against Tee Keat draws a blank PDF Print
Posted by admin
Wednesday, 07 October 2009 09:48

By Lourdes Charles, The Star

PETALING JAYA: The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has not found any evidence to indicate that MCA president Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat received RM10mil from Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd CEO Datuk Seri Tiong King Sing for party activities.

It is learnt that investigations by the commission have so far drawn a blank, and nothing has been uncovered to back Tiong’s allegations.

Tiong himself is being investigated by the police and the MACC for fraud, including overcharging and unsubstantiated claims in the construction of the controversial RM4.6bil Port Klang Free Zone project.

Sources familiar with the investigations said the commission interviewed more than seven witnesses, including Tiong and Ong, who has vehemently denied the allegations.

(Ong has since filed a RM500mil suit against Tiong for unfounded and defamatory remarks by Tiong following the Port Klang Free Zone disclosure. The High Court has set Nov 4 to hear the suit.)

Sources said MACC officers, besides questioning all those allegedly involved, also checked their bank accounts.

It is learnt the MACC was expected to submit its findings to its legal and prosecution department, and to the Attorney-General’s chambers for advice.

Tiong, the Bintulu MP and treasurer-general of the Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party (SPDP), made the allegations after a report by PricewaterhouseCoopers Advisory Services (PwC), which was commissioned by Port Klang Authority (PKA) to look at the PKFZ project, was released.

The report by the Special Task Force formed by the Transport Ministry on June 10 alleged that Kuala Dimensi, the main developer appointed as the sole turnkey contractor for the project, was involved in possible fraud, including overcharging and unsubstantiated claims which could run up to RM1.6bil.

PwC estimated that based on current projections of revenue and costs, including interest costs, the project could eventually cost RM12.45bil.

Ong, in his statement of claim, demanded that Tiong fully withdraw his defamatory remarks and publish an apology in major Malaysian newspapers of all languages.

The purpose of such remarks, he said, were to tarnish his name.

He said they were published with the element of mala fide by Tiong to obstruct fair and just investigations into the misuse of funds in the PKFZ issue and the role played by Tiong’s company in the controversy.

Anonymous said...

版主:我收到一则党争短讯,可以代为张贴吗?

当权私有化+党务空泛化+党章颠覆化+党性血腥化+事实谎言化=翁总的神话。